Japan, and the truck driver's "snow delivery cake" attracted praise Taiwan Net Beauty Rating Scale: Those who made the news by "selling meat" are at phone database most "Bronze" The world's first animal-to-human transmission, Russia confirms 7 people infected with "H5N8" bird flu Migrant Work Site Realistic Experience Camp, where schoolchildren act as "one-day migrant workers" to experience the life of a foreig What we want you to know is Like the oil wars of the last century, the chip wars of this century are full of geopolitical gouges from design, foundry to sales. Aside from Apple,
big customers like Qualcomm and NVIDIA still haven't completely cut off orders with Samsung or Intel. From a commercial point of view, this is to avoid the risks that may arise from relying on a single supplier, but from a geopolitical point of view, it is each economy's calculation to protect its own interests. Samsung Electronics, a major South Korean semiconductor manufacturer, will start mass production of 3-nanometer semiconductor chips in the second half of this year (2022). Facing the challenge, TSMC, the global chip foundry leader, also announced that its 3nm process (generally refers to the process of wafer production and processing)
will enter mass production in the second half of the year as scheduled. The world's two largest foundry leaders have entered a new stage in the wrestling of advanced manufacturing processes. At the same time, the geopolitical race behind the chips is heating up. The CHIPS Act, which was pushed by US President Joe Biden after taking office, passed the Senate on Wednesday and is expected to be voted on by the House of Representatives on Thursday. The bill aims to help the U.S. semiconductor industry become self-sufficient and to subsidize "similar value" foreign semiconductor manufacturers to set up factories in the